Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences https://sifisheriessciences.com/index.php/journal <center> <p style="text-align: center;"><img src="https://sifisheriessciences.com/public/site/images/editor_sfs/banner1-225d04234926d2a3e08e4ed4e9da22a1.jpg" alt="" width="45%" height="auto" /> <img src="https://sifisheriessciences.com/public/site/images/editor_sfs/banner2.jpg" alt="" width="45%" height="auto" /></p> </center> <p><strong>Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences (SFS) ISSN: 2368-7487,</strong> is published three times annually in February, June, and October. This is a scientific journal reporting on research in aquatic disciplines related to fisheries.<br /> Research papers on fisheries /aquaculture and fishery-related subjects will be considered for publication. All material submitted must be original and unpublished. Three categories of papers are considered for publication: “Original research,”, “Short communications,” and “Reviews.”<br />Topics of interest to the journal include new information on various animal and plant species related to fisheries and aquaculture. Specific areas of interest include aquatic ecosystems, methods of propagation and culture of high value aquatic resources, pollution and its effect on the environment and aquatic species, nutrition, health and diseases of aquatic species, research on fish processing and production of new products, protection of recovering stocks and sustainable exploitation of living resources, and finally the economic and social aspects of fisheries.<br /><br />All articles are Open Access and are immediately available online at no cost to read, distribute, and/or reuse.<br />Expert reviewers will evaluate the articles submitted to the journal. While the objective of the peer review process is to ensure high quality science, peer reviewers do not make the final decision to accept or reject papers for publication. The decision-making authority rests solely with the journal editor and the journal’s editorial board. The journal decision-making process includes the following steps:</p> <ol> <li>Registration on the Journal’s website by the corresponding author and providing the full affiliation of all authors. Submission of the paper in proper format is required.</li> <li>After a paper is submitted to the journal, the Journal’s editor and/or a member of the editorial board will screen the manuscript and decide whether or not to send it for full peer review. At this stage the paper may also be returned to the author for reformatting or other corrections to meet the minimum requirements of the Journal.</li> <li>After clearing the initial screening up to three peer reviewers are allocated to review the manuscript. The editor or a member of the editorial board may also review the manuscript.</li> <li>The peer review is a double-blind process, which means that both the reviewers and authors identities are concealed throughout the review process.</li> <li>The Journal’s editor considers the peer reviewers’ reports, along with the evaluation form (completed by the reviewers), and makes a final decision as follows:</li> </ol> <p>a. If at least two reviewers recommend to rejection, the editor may reject the paper at this stage. <br /> b. If at least one reviewer requests a major correction, the paper is sent back to the author to provide corrections and/or appropriate responses to the reviewer’s comments.<br />c. If any of the reviewers decline to review the paper, or do not send their response about the paper within the predefined period of time, then another reviewer will be assigned by the editor.<br />6. As soon as the corrected version of the paper along with the responses to the reviewers’ comments are submitted to the journal (normally within 2 weeks), they will be checked by the editor and sent to one of the reviewers for final consideration and recommendation.<br />7. Based on the full peer review process outlined above the final decision is made by the editorial board.<br />8. A formal letter of acceptance is issued by the Journal’s office for the accepted papers.<br />9. The papers are published in the journal based on a “first come, first served” policy.</p> en-US editor@sifisheriessciences.com (Editor Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences) editor@sifisheriessciences.com (Iraq/Iran Contact support) Wed, 01 Jan 2025 06:10:11 +0000 OJS 3.3.0.11 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Physiological Responses Of Cotton Plant (Gossypium Hirsutum L.) To Foliar Sprayed Folic And Salicylic Acid Under Drought Conditions https://sifisheriessciences.com/index.php/journal/article/view/3289 <p>The current study was conducted from February 2023 to August 2023 at a local farm in the Biology Department, College of Science, University of Zakho in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. It aimed to examine the effects of drought and the application of salicylic and folic acid on some physiological parameters of two cotton (<em>Gossypium hirsutum</em> L.) cultivars (MAY 505 and MAY 455). For this reason, a randomized complete block design (RCBD) was used to assess the&nbsp;physiological aspects of the&nbsp;cotton plant. Both cotton cultivars were treated with salicylic acid (SA) at concentrations of 0, 1, and 2 mM, and folic acid (FA) at 0, 5, and 10 mM, separately and in combination, and subjected to three drought periods as (continuous irrigation (Ci), 10, and 15 days thirst). The results indicated that proline content was the highest in plants treated with (1 mM SA) at (33.75 µg/mg) in MAY 505 and (28.29 µg/mg) in MAY 455 under similar drought conditions. Further, plants sprayed with (5 mM FA) showed the highest chlorophyll content at (46.82 SPAD value) for MAY 505 and (50.77 SPAD value) for MAY 455. The application of (2 mM SA) scored the highest increase in P, K, and Mn, while the applied (10 mM FA) showed the highest increase in N and Cu. Cultivar MAY 505 was&nbsp;shown to be more responsive in addressing drought periods than MAY 455.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Mohammed Basheer Ismael, Diaa Ayoub Ibrahim Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences https://sifisheriessciences.com/index.php/journal/article/view/3289 Tue, 14 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000 The Impact Of Biochar And Compost As A Soil Amendment On The Growth, Yield, And Chemical Composition Of Maize (Zea Mays): A Study On Two Different Land Uses https://sifisheriessciences.com/index.php/journal/article/view/3244 <p class="allcontents" style="margin-right: 1.65pt; line-height: normal;"><span lang="EN-MY" style="font-size: 10.0pt;">Soil health is the production base, and management allows manufacturers to work with the land. Healthy soil provides a clean environment and nutritious crop. The performance of the crop on alkaline-saline soil is incomplete due to poor nutrient management. Biochar and compost initiated distinctive biomass to improve soil health. Equally; limited studies were conducted on the co-application of biochar and compost produced from the same field of alkaline. Therefore; a pot experiment of two different soils i.e. banana cultivated fields (BCF) and Coastal fallow land (CFL) was conducted to estimate the effect of co-application of biochar and compost on the soil properties, growth, and yield attributes of Maize. Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with a total of 24 pots, filled with 15kg of soil, with four different treatments including control (Co), 1% Compost (C), 1% Biochar (B), and 1% Biochar + Compost (B+C), within three times replicate. Generally; study findings showed that 1%B+C has a significant (p&lt;0.05) effect on the growth and yield followed by 1%C, 1%B, and Co. In the comparison of the alone 1%B and 1%C, 1%C performs better and more significantly (p&lt;0.05) different compared to 1%biochar and control. Similarly; the availability of NPK, SOM%, and CEC of both BCF and CFL increased within co-application of 1% B+C, compared to 1%C, and 1%B. While; the increased order of the co-application was recorded as 1%B+C &gt;1%B &gt; 1%C and Co. Consequently, co-application of 1%B+C with fertilizer could be a suitable management approach to increased crop yield and improve soil health of the alkaline calcareous soil.</span></p> Sher Jan, Shahmir Ali Kalhoro, Qamar Sarfaraz, Punhoon khan korai, Ammar Rasheed, Muhammad Abuzar Jaffar, Iftakhar Ahmed, Abdul Hafeez Mastoi, Gulab Jan, Shabir Ahmed, Sidra Majeed, Usama Rasheed, Ghulam Haider Angaria, Shah Muhammad, Abdul Salam, Naguman Ali, Honak Baloch, Khurram shahzad Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences https://sifisheriessciences.com/index.php/journal/article/view/3244 Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000 Knowledge of rural women in some environmental issues in Duhok Governorate, Kurdistan region of Iraq https://sifisheriessciences.com/index.php/journal/article/view/3280 <p>The main objective of this study is to identify the rural women’s knowledge in some environmental domains in Duhok Governorate, Kurdistan region of Iraq. Area random sampling was used to select the research sample which is (507) rural women. A questionnaire was designed to collect the research data, which is consisted of two parts, the independent variables and knowledge test consisted of (47) items distributed on four domains (Home waste management, Sustainable agriculture, Sustainable methods of using and conservation of forest, and Rural tourism). Experts and content validity were used to achieve the validity of the knowledge test, and Kurder-Richardson21 formula was used to measure the reliability of it, it is value was (0.777). The data was analyzed with SPSS program. The results showed that knowledge level of the respondents in all the studied environmental domains is medium tends to low. Home waste management domain ranked the first (=7.719). While rural tourism domain ranked the last (=4.888). The result also showed that there is significant correlation between the knowledge level of respondents and each of the following variables (Level of education, Satisfaction with services in the village, Agricultural information sources, and Cultural openness). While there is no significant correlation with :( Age, Material status, Current work, and Participation in family decision –making). The research included some conclusion and recommendations.</p> Mijda Bahzad M. Alsinayi, Dr.Abid Ali Hasan Al-Doski, Dr. Aamel F.K. Alabbassi Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences https://sifisheriessciences.com/index.php/journal/article/view/3280 Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000