A study on learning immersion, online class satisfaction, and perceived academic achievement of flip-learning online classes

This is an outdated version published on 2023-03-12. Read the most recent version.

PDF

Published: Mar 12, 2023

Versions:

2023-03-24 (2)

2023-03-12 (1)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17762/sfs.v10i4S.736

Keywords:

Background/Objectives: Stroke is a critical chronic health problem in rehabilitation.We aimed to review the fidelityof home-based virtualand robotic rehabilitation studies in stroke survivors. Methods/Statistical analysis: We searched electronic databases such as NBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, and CINAHAL to find the relevant literature. Keywords or MeSH terms such as “stroke,” “virtual reality,” “augmented reality,” and “tele* were searched for and articles published prior to February 20, 2021, were included. A total of six published articles were reviewed; three studies used virtual therapies for home-based rehabilitation of stroke survivors, and the remaining three studies used robotic therapy. Findings: In the aforementionedsix studies selected for reviewing, the FuglMeyer Assessment scale was frequently used to assess physical function. The intervention period in general was 20–45 minutes per session for 8 weeks, but some studies were unrestricted. Virtual therapy has been shown to vary depending on personal conditions. However, this was similar to the regular application of 2–3 cycles per week. Intervention doses in robotic therapywere higher than those in virtual therapy.The findings indicate thatvirtual therapy improved upper limb function in all studies, whereas robotic home-based rehabilitation did not improve arm function. Improvements/Applications: The frequency of use and dose of the virtual device were lower than those of the robot-assisted device but not inferior to those of the robot. Virtual and robotic devices can be useful tools for home-based rehabilitation.

Soo-Kyung Bok, Youngshin Song, Bohyun Kim, Ancho Lim, Hyunsuk Choi, Hyunkyung Shin, Subeen Ji, Sohyun Jin

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Stroke is a critical chronic health problem in rehabilitation.We aimed to review the fidelityof home-based virtualand robotic rehabilitation studies in stroke survivors.

Methods/Statistical analysis: We searched electronic databases such as NBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, and CINAHAL to find the relevant literature. Keywords or MeSH terms such as “stroke,” “virtual reality,” “augmented reality,” and “tele* were searched for and articles published prior to February 20, 2021, were included. A total of six published articles were reviewed; three studies used virtual therapies for home-based rehabilitation of stroke survivors, and the remaining three studies used robotic therapy.

Findings: In the aforementionedsix studies selected for reviewing, the FuglMeyer Assessment scale was frequently used to assess physical function. The intervention period in general was 20–45 minutes per session for 8 weeks, but some studies were unrestricted. Virtual therapy has been shown to vary depending on personal conditions. However, this was similar to the regular application of 2–3 cycles per week. Intervention doses in robotic therapywere higher than those in virtual therapy.The findings indicate thatvirtual therapy improved upper limb function in all studies, whereas robotic home-based rehabilitation did not improve arm function.

Improvements/Applications: The frequency of use and dose of the virtual device were lower than those of the robot-assisted device but not inferior to those of the robot. Virtual and robotic devices can be useful tools for home-based rehabilitation.

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 4S (2023): Special Issue 4

Section

Articles

Article Sidebar

Main Article Content

Abstract

Article Details